Amazon has announce that the newest version of its famous Kindle e-reader device will be hitting the (virtual) shelves on August 27th. At £109 for a Wi-Fi device, and £149 for 3G + Wi-Fi, the reading device is certainly one of the most affordable readers available – but is it better than a book? We’ve scoured the web to find out if the Kindle really is the droid we’ve been looking for.
The first stop on the Kindle-trail was Amazon’s own website – no-one has laid-out the merits of the new device better than them:
Outside of these mainstream enhancements, i-Reader Review has revealed 22 interesting things about the Kindle 3, the most interesting of which are:
CrunchGear have shed some light on the use of the microphone, announcing it will be used for a “new voice navigation option”.
The real insight comes from the good people over at Engadget, who actually managed to get their hands on the new handheld. The feedback is mainly positive, reporting that “the Kindle is still very much the reading device you know and love (or hate, depending on your preferences). The build quality and materials used did seem slightly more polished than the previous version, and we really liked the new, more subtle rocker. We can also attest to screen refreshes and overall navigation feeling noticeably more responsive and snappy compared with the previous generation.”
The people at PC Advisor, however, are even more generous, claiming that the new device is “is unlike any other e-book reader [they’ve] handled before” and that “its lighter weight and its more compact design [gives] a more pleasing experience than with earlier models. The unit felt very balanced in-hand, and the buttons felt like they were in convenient, ergonomic places (more on that in a moment).” The conclusion is that it’s “a winner poised to top the pack.”
Other details have been also been revealed by CNN, including the Kindle’s code-name: Shasta. They also noted Amazon’s intentions for the device, by quoting Amazon’s VP of Kindle content, Russ Grandinetti: “It’s like running shoes. If I’m going five miles, I put on a pair that are designed for running and will be supportive, not my Chucks.”
ZDNET’s have managed to cover it twice already, with one blogger claiming that, “$139 was enough to make me sit up and take notice, though, and give some more serious thought to what it would take for Kindles to start really adding value”, while another announced the “Amazon Kindle will be the sole survivor of the eReader Apocalypse”.
It seems that from various hands-on tests, Amazon’s claims are true: the new Kindle is better than its predecessor in every way. And as a dedicated ebook reader, its stiffest competition was probably its older self – with newer readers, such as the Nook, underwhelming critics.
For everyone who wants a media-rich, iPad-clone, however, the Kindle is still not (and never tried to be) an alternative – sorry, you’ll still have to fork out over £500 and buy Apple.
Even students might think twice about this one – sure, it can post book extracts to Facebook and Twitter (possibly pretentious?), but without a touchscreen or stylus annotation system, it’ll only provide half the experience of a regular textbook.
For me, however, the £109 cost and positive reviews have sold me. The sheer number of out-of-copyright books that can be downloaded for free means that it’ll have paid for itself in about twenty reads. For standard books it seems that the new Kindle is finally ready to take over the bookshelf.